Time memory direct answer
Time Memory Test
Time Memory Test measures interval reproduction. You experience a hidden duration, then recreate it without watching a timer.
The report compares target duration and submitted duration with absolute error, relative error, and log-ratio timing error. This makes early/late bias and proportional timing drift visible.
This is not a neurological, attention, or reaction-time diagnosis. Browser timing, input latency, refresh rate, focus, and device behavior can change results.
Target source Seed-generated intervals, with ranges controlled by difficulty.
Measurement Absolute error, relative error, signed timing bias, and log-ratio timing error.
Report use Early/late bias, interval-length sensitivity, consistency, and same-seed comparison.
Boundary Not an ADHD test, neurological test, or medical attention assessment.
Evidence
What authority supports this test?
The app compares target duration and submitted duration using absolute error, relative error, and Weber fraction-style signed error.
The cited timing-perception papers support scalar timing, ratio error, and timing variability language. They do not certify this browser task.
Target fairness
How same-seed comparison stays fair
Bot Challenge is a labeled system rival for immediate comparison.
Friend Challenge and Live Match use the same seed, difficulty, and round count, so both sides reproduce the same hidden intervals.
Limits
What can affect the result?
Input device latency, browser frame timing, attention, audio/visual lag, and refresh rate can change timing results.
Report meaning
What the time report should explain
A useful time report separates accuracy from bias. A user can be consistent but always early, or inconsistent with no stable direction.
The report should also explain device limits because a browser-based timing task includes input and rendering latency.